Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Publishing Resource Center (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per WP:PROCEDURALCLOSE. Article prose has not changed since the close. Please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review if you have an issue with the previous close. (non-admin closure) – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:13, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Independent Publishing Resource Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a promotional web page for the organization, not an encyclopedia article . The sources are all local, and most of them PR or mere notices like a routine inclusion on a listing of events. DGG ( talk ) 07:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Seriously? Strong keep. We just went over this. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:28, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the previous AfD was only 5 months ago. It closed as keep and I don't see anything improper in that close. Vexations (talk) 17:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)